Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a very good experience with Garmin eTrex Legend HCx - here and here they write that HCx has a very sensitive chip, that works in forest, deep valleys and in cities - and I can only confirm - with HCx I was able to get my position in plane!

How sensitive is eTrex 30, related to HCx? Have you been able to catch satellites in room / plane / in a narrow street? eTrex 30 doesn't say to be that sensitive at garmin website.

(Could HCx then be more precise/usable in these conditions despite eTrex 30 supporting GLONASS?)

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I guess it depends where you are located, as the precision of the etrex 30 will depend on how many satellites (GPS and Glonass) you can see. As far as I know (but I might be wrong), the Glonass constellation is not so dense over northern America, but better in Asia and Europe.

From my experience the sensitivity of the etrex30 is much much better than the one of the Legend. In the house where I am now, I get an (horizontal) accuracy of less than 10 meters. Outside, I almost always have 3-5 meters. In cities, with narrow streets, I haven't ever lost a signal so far, same in a forest. Haven't tried in a plane yet.

Also, the battery seems to last much longer than the Legend . Finally, it doesn't have the rubber problem of the etrex Legend.

I do not work for Garmin, but I would warmly recommend this one!

Hope that helps!

share|improve this answer
    
thanks, Stephane! But what about the eTrex 30 display and functionality? Are you satisfied? I really didn't like the 30's display, it looks kind of blurred and dull, whereas the HCx was razor sharp. Thanks –  Tomas Feb 20 '12 at 20:05
1  
True enough, the display is rather small and not of the highest definition, which is probably why it is comparatively so cheap. That being said, the screen is still very easy to read, even in the sun, and I didn't have any problem with the Swiss national maps (raster and vector). Also, the "poor" quality of the screen allows for a long battery life. PS: totally satisfied with the functionalities. Nothing really new compared with old etrex, but better and cleaner presentation. That can't hurt! –  Stéphane Henriod Feb 20 '12 at 20:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.