Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hi there at the new forum,

I'm still struggling with projections in qgis. The "Vogelschutzgebiete" reprojection worked. But these ones seem to be tougher:

as well as the same URL with at the end.

Are these the same projections? Does anyone here by any chance know how to reproject these to EPSG:32633 (WGS84 UTM33N)? (shapes without projection information are a pain in the a...)

Refering also to this thread:

best regards desputin

share|improve this question
Hi, we meet again! I think that Aemter.shp might be either in EPSG:31468 or EPSG:31464, but I'm not sure (there appears to be a small shift). It might be worth reprojecting the shapefile from EPSG:31468 to EPSG:32633 to see how it fits with your other data. – nhopton Apr 1 '12 at 10:39
I think that the Gemeinden and the Amter shapefiles are both projected to EPSG:31468 (DHDN/3-degree Gauss-Kruger zone 4) or something near to this. What worries me is that they don't map onto the real world very well, there appears to be a shift to the north of about 1500 metres, which is why I haven't presented this as an answer. Nick. – nhopton Apr 1 '12 at 18:09
up vote 2 down vote accepted

should your shapefiles look like these ones??



I simply create two new files Aemter.prj and Gemeinden.prj, which contain both the following text:

GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984",DATUM["D_WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137.0,298.257223563]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]] (actually, I did not create them, just made copies of an existing one and renamed them properly)

Hope this helps, let me know, if this answer is useful to you

Kurt edit: your new file looks like this to me: enter image description here

share|improve this answer
Hi, thanks again for the reply. In the meantime I have found the solution I had to convert from EPSG:2398 – desputin Apr 12 '12 at 19:01
Hi! I still have a problems with other data of this type. Coult somewone of you have a look at this shape and see if it works for you to reproject it to UTM33N / WGS84? best regards and thanks desputin – desputin May 7 '12 at 17:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.