Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are the OGC-Simple feature access and the ISO (ISO/IEC 13249-3:2011 "Information technology - Database languages - SQL multimedia and application packages - Part 3: Spatial") significantly different (different enought to justify purchasing the ISO/IEC 13249-3:2011 PDF)?

share|improve this question
I think it depends on what you are doing. If you are doing conformance / compliance testing, then definitely yes. If you are using some pretty standard queries and its working for you, almost certainly not. What is the goal? – BradHards Dec 12 '12 at 2:02
up vote 4 down vote accepted

If you are working with geometry types beyond the usual point/line/polygon/collection or are working with more than 2 dimensions, then yes, get the ISO spec. Otherwise, no. Also get the old OGC guidance on WKB for higher dimensions (or read the PostGIS doc) in case you're worried about maximum interoperability. (For 2d and simple geometries the new ISO stuff is a superset of the old stuff (and neither of them usefully describe how to handle EMPTY geometries in WKB, in 2d or otherwise)).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.