Tell me more ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've recently started sorting out the static content on our sites and adding Expires headers to it.
My question is, when it comes to the stuff in our GeoWebCache, is it worth adding expires headers to these? The particular areas I was thinking of was our Aerial Photography and Historic Maps, which will never, ever change. Will adding Expires headers result in some of this content actually being cached on the users browser or will it make no difference at all.

I was thinking that because of the amount of imagery (256x256 JPEG tiles) there would be little benefit to expires headers, as the browser would not cache it all, and might even start discarding the 'proper' static content (Icons, Backgrounds etc.) resulting in more requests to the server for this content, which is not ideal as I would rather this content stayed with the client.

I hope this makes some sort of sense, I am brand new to this idea of Expires Headers and thought it was something my predecessors would have included but evidentally not! Any advice is much appreciated, just check out that accept rate ;-)

share|improve this question
After a bit more looking around I've decided this is probably a stupid idea as there is very little chance the browser cache would hold this much, especially if the user then dared to go elsewhere on the internet, any other thoughts are still welcome though! – Rob Quincey Jun 29 '12 at 8:39

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.