Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A geodatabase doesn't provide much flexibility in organizing your data hierarchically. All feature sets live either at the top level of the database, or one level down in feature datasets. A feature dataset can't, in turn, contain another dataset. I'm interested in hearing how others organize their data, especially in environments where they must use a geodatabase and are stuck with these limitations.

share|improve this question
    
Enterprise Geodatabase (ArcSDE) support Versioning resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//… –  Mapperz Jun 29 '12 at 21:11
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Typical organization methods that I've seen are by prefixing. In an enterprise geodatabase, this can be done with an owner/schema name (e.g. UTIL.WMETER or by prefixing the featureclass/table name itself with a prefix string, then underscore, then name UTIL_WMETER). Prefixing the featureclass/table name also works in personal/file geodatabases.

Because of editing overhead for feature datasets, they aren't usually used as a primary organizational mechanism.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.