Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have come across a resource that we rely upon almost daily that is in terrible need of repair. It is not our own product and the supplier is generally not interested in fixing the problem.

We are using a polygon shapefile which contains upwards of 2000 parcel boundaries. The parcels themselves are not parcels in the general sense of the term, but nevertheless, it describes the data quite effectively. No 'parcel' shall overlap or produce gaps between parcels. However, the data quality is terribly low and it almost seems like the parcels have been drawn by hand with snapping disabled! See picture below:

enter image description here

In some cases, it is much worse than in the photo, or the gaps/overlapping is so small that they are unidentifiable until after running spatial procedures (such as intersections).

How would one go about fixing these kinds of issues? I have attached the shapefile which represents the 8 polygons in the photo. These 8 polygons show both my gap and overlapping issue. Can the process be automated to fix my 2000+ parcels?

http://temp-share.com/show/dPf3mpihW

Note: I have explored the "fix geometry" tool in ArcMap, but this only corrects the overlapping polygons. Albeit the overlapping geometry is the worse of the two problems, I'd like to fix both if possible!

share|improve this question
    
What license level are you running? (ArcView, ArcEditor, or ArcInfo?) –  Kirk Kuykendall Jul 20 '12 at 17:07
    
ArcInfo with all extensions available. –  Michael Markieta Jul 20 '12 at 17:49
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

The best way is to convert this shape file to file-geodatabase and build the topology in ArcGIS for "Must Not Gaps" and "Must Not Overlap".

Important thing in building topology is cluster tolerance. This is tolerance in which topology will remove/fix errors automatically after validating. So you should select this tolerance very carefully as big values can produce some unexpected results.

For more info please see this

share|improve this answer
7  
+1 This seems like a perfect situation for topology rules. –  Roy Jul 20 '12 at 15:00
    
Thank you for introducing me to something that I've been too scared to explore before now. ;) –  Michael Markieta Jul 23 '12 at 19:38
    
Agreed - we have the exact same problem, with the majority of the gaps/overlaps only visible at 1:10, and I have personally spent days fixing topology on "parcels" before we could actually use the data. –  Arabella Jul 25 '12 at 8:36
add comment

Another alternative would be to use the Eliminate (Data Management) tool in Arc. However, I agree with iRfAn and Roy that topology rules would be the best practice in your case if you are looking for a long term solution.

Source: ESRI

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.