What is the difference between egeoxml and geoxml? What i know is both are client-side parsers and both allow me to edit the kml files on the run.
I guess egeoxml is an initiative by google itself and would require the KML file to be at a publicly accesible location which is not the case in geoxml. Also the documentation available for egeoxml(http://econym.org.uk/gmap/egeoxml.htm) is more as compared to geoxml.
But which one of them is better? I mean Performance-wise ? And an extension to this question is that if i have a website which is public, then there is nothing called locally accesible KML, because even geoxml requires the KML files to be present on the same server where the maps are.http://code.google.com/p/geoxml3/ (Last point in General Notes.)