Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I used qgis 1.8 to compose a map from the WMS-service of the Belgian NGI. I added a scalebar and grid to it. When I measure it by hand, the distance between the longitudelines is 101mm instead of 100mm. The distance between the lattitudelines is correct.

Even the scalebar is 1mm to long.

Has somebody encountered the same problem yet?

share|improve this question
First, scale is never constant on a flat map, so the first thing is to determine the true range of scales in your projection: that might explain the difference you obtain. Second, what exactly are you measuring? A printout? A computer monitor? In either case, have you calibrated your output device to check that its aspect is true? (One quick check is to display the same map rotated 90 degrees and remeasure the distances.) – whuber Aug 27 '12 at 14:04
If it's a public WMS server could you post a link to it, with details of the layer(s) you're using? N. – nhopton Aug 27 '12 at 18:29
I'm using Top10R_L72 from First you have to be registered to get access (it's free) – PieterB Sep 5 '12 at 8:21
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The WMS Pieter is using is most likely the test setup NGI is running for now. The url's from NGI are only available after signing up (free) at the NGI website, and provide imagery with a watermark over it. NGI offers the normal (non-watermark) imagery as a paying service.

So I guess neither qualifies as public.

I'm assuming he made a printout, and measured on the print. Might very well be a printer setting. I would suggest testing an image savefile if it occurs in the file itself or not, to be able to rule out printer issues first, as that's my main suspect so far.

share|improve this answer
I think it's the callibrating of the printer. I tried a 90 degree rotation and the distance was much closer to 100mm – PieterB Sep 5 '12 at 8:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.