Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I have always been curious how other folks are storing their spatial data. Outside of an enterprise environment where much data is stored in enterprise geodatabases, is it better to store data per project in project folders, (The data may be important for other projects too, or maybe for a stand alone project) OR is it better to file everything in specific geodatabases or main folders - with shapefiles (accessible for many projects)? How do you manage data accessability? What has worked well for you?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by R.K., whuber Feb 17 '13 at 22:04

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
See also: gis.stackexchange.com/questions/721/… –  mwalker Sep 11 '12 at 16:18
4  
Project Folders with all the related data - works with archiving (so after 5 years easily retrieval-able if the media format is in-date) links up precisely with invoice job-id for taxation purposes. note: most companies have to keep data for 7 years. –  Mapperz Sep 11 '12 at 16:38
    
@Mapperz - I like your long term record management thinking. Its definatey important to think of the 7 year permanancy, legality or historic-ness of the data or if it is only transitory data (temporary). –  Sue Deforest Sep 11 '12 at 18:27
1  

2 Answers 2

Though I am not too experienced with spatial data management, I found the following Software-Carpentry.org video tutorial (discussing general data management practices, widely applicable to various scenarios) pretty helpful:

share|improve this answer

The thing about non-enterprise data storage is the users of this data frequently have changing/varying needs. In an enterprise setting it's not always most efficient to store data in central geodatabases, but it goes a long way in sticking people to standards, which can be taught and monitored.

At the most basic level, a small company should house any "universal data" in a globally accessible (in terms of the organization) place. For example, if the company works mainly within one state/province they would store all state-wide base layers on a server. Any common edits (clipped regions) would be stored in sub-folders/geodatabases.

The next level of data storage (personal) can go a few ways. If many people work on a single project they may need to store their data on the same globally accessible server. If only one person is working on the project a local storage solution (backed up!) is fine. How this is done would be up to the individual user, but I think it's safe to say a common solution would be to use individual project folders, possibly containing geodatabases, depending on the project specifics.

Edit: If we're talking about a single user, the same general idea applies. Instead of housing global data on a server, they would use a separate drive/partition/sub-folder.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.