Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the best definition of Geographical Information Systems?

Has the definition changed at all since I was taught it 10yrs back? The technology has changed a lot and it is more powerful than it used to be, but has that changed the overall definition of what it is?

e.g. Is stuff like Augmented Reality a separate discipline altogether, or does it also merge into the world of GIS

share|improve this question
Simon, is this to provide a starting point to introduce a class to GIS? This reminds me of how one of my intro geography classes started with the statement 'geography is what geographers do' perhaps if that is your intent, then asking the question what is GIS would be an interesting starting point – Dan Patterson Nov 26 '10 at 19:15
"Simon, is this to provide a starting point to introduce a class to GIS?" = Exactly. I refrained from asking 'What is GIS' to avoid getting a lot of older text book answers. – Simon Nov 27 '10 at 6:25
Welcome to GIS Stack Exchange! Please write in lowercase in the future, as uppercase is frowned upon and considered shouting. – lynxlynxlynx Sep 3 '12 at 11:08
up vote 8 down vote accepted

My definition of GIS is...

Using a map to answer a question.

When an understanding of the system has been developed that allows the use of the data and interface provided, to a point that users can answer questions and relate locational information to everyday tasks the system has become usable.

GIS "IS" to each user what best answers a locational problem for them. (It could be that if a business is paying for the system then it would "need" to be a business problem). However there are many non-business problems that can be answered that could be considered perks or job benefits. These only add to the understanding and use of locational information (GIS) in the general public. In other words IMHO limiting the use of the information only limits the understanding of GIS.

Part of the understanding and use is that there needs to be a buy-in or time investment from some segment of the users that collects, updates, or otherwise changes data to add either accuracy, additional information, or currency to complete the cycle of use.

The accuracy and currency of the data can take priority over the changes and usefullness of the interface only for a short time.

The changes and enhancements to the interface need to take into account segments of users and possibly even be developed for small sets of users and groups. While making access constraints and data availablity to user groups a priority.

share|improve this answer
I'm not sure if it's using a map. More like using spatial data. Maps are too narrow for GIS. There are questions that you can answer without even looking at the graphic output of data. – George Mar 2 '11 at 11:22
@George that would be statistics. The data is one of the most important pieces. There is a reason geographic is at the front. There are also answers you can't get without looking at the graphic output. That is the geo-graphic part. – Brad Nesom Mar 2 '11 at 14:11

This folds a little bit into this existing forum

Define the "system" in Geographic Information System

To answer the exact question I would say things like the Augmented reality fall into a Geographic Exploration System where the user is exploring the world around them. Whereas a GIS alludes to storage and analysis as well as visualisation.

Just my take, CDB

share|improve this answer

An interesting definition has been provided there.

share|improve this answer

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

GIS is too big with too many meanings for different people. It really needs to be understood by doing (i.e. using software, dealing with data) combined with understandings of theoretical concepts. That said, any particular software will provide its own slightly personal definition and include or exclude topics and definitions and capabilities that are either taken for granted or disregarded.

As an example, Manifold Software include modern computing performance, large memory handling, 64-bit capability and database principles into the mix as a crucial part of the "definition". They also explicitly include the user as part of the definition and point to ways to maximize performance and improve results by understanding these as fundamental aspects of a "Geographic Information System".

EDIT: elaborated to try to answer the q.

share|improve this answer
Got not problems with Manifold, but this does not answer the Q. – Simon Nov 27 '10 at 6:34
Hi mdsummer, perhaps it'd be best to post this as a new answer and delete your original? The original has already been marked down a bit, and it may not be seen by folks who ignore the "bad" answers. – scw Mar 1 '11 at 22:22
ok thanks, maybe next time - happy to see how this goes – mdsumner Mar 1 '11 at 22:31
retracted downvote. – Simon Apr 1 '11 at 7:03

My definition:

Traditional map making is an expensive and time consuming process. Since the introduction of computers the quantity and breadth of maps available to people has exploded, due to reduced cost and difficulty. GIS is the techniques, tools and processes that enabled that growth.

share|improve this answer

My definition:

A system (computer or not) that relates information with geographic features.

In the essence of this definition a GIS could be even a paper map with numbered areas and a book with tables with the information related to that numbers.

share|improve this answer

GIS Clouds

"Cloud computing furnishes technological [GIS] capabilities—commonly maintained off premises"

(so no they are not in the sky)

share|improve this answer
good example of how things are changing with GIS. However, can you go into more specifics on how technologies like this change the definition of GIS (if at all). i.e. Does not answer the Q – Simon Nov 27 '10 at 6:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.