Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have one very simple workbench that I am running against both SDE (9.3) and FGDB (10.0) sources.

I noticed two different fme_geometry values for same type of objects.

For the first one, i.e SDE 9.3, I have fme_geometry=fme_donut, but for the same features in FGDB 10.0 I have fme_geometry=fme_aggregate.

Is this a "problem" of converting ESRI data from 9.3 to 10.0 or how FME interprets geometry?

Because in case of fme_aggregate, FME is doing "additional" job of constructing donuts again:

Calculating inside points
Determining uppermost containment
Constructing donuts from xxx points

(Visible in log window)

share|improve this question
An fme_aggregate is equivalent to a multi-part polygon. Are you sure that the features you are comparing are actually the same in this respect (it would seem that one is multi-part and the other is not). – blah238 Jan 14 '13 at 8:16
Also I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but you will probably get more focused answers on the FME Community Answers site than here. – blah238 Jan 14 '13 at 8:35
ok, you have right blah238! – Z77 Jan 14 '13 at 9:23
Anyone here? I asked this question FME Community also. – Z77 Jan 15 '13 at 7:49
FME can transform your information from SDE to FGDB for compatibility. Example: I think the scale or the tolerance of ArcSDE are not the same in FGDB. – user3120 Feb 13 '13 at 15:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.