Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In our current workflow we are working in a Personal Geodatabase with few features and related tables , many persons will be working in different schemes.

When we need to merge these schemes\Pgdb to a single output , we are copying feature class to feature class . Obviously this changes the Object ID in the resulting output Geodatabase and we lose the related table Information.

Is there any way to copy feature classes from different inputs Pgdbs and still preserve the related table ?

share|improve this question
    
Can you rebuild your relates with ID fields that are not ObjectID fields? –  Hornbydd Mar 12 '13 at 15:01
    
I am not sure, but the situation is like , a feature class is made of different subtypes and this Origin feature class subtype deals with the related table by means of Object ID.. Primary key is Object Id and there is a foriegn key.. Thanks for giving a viewpoint for me to give a try.. –  Adarsh Madhavan Mar 12 '13 at 15:22
    
You have relationship-class as a tag but do not mention using one. Are you? Also, why Personal rather than File Geodatabases? –  PolyGeo Mar 13 '13 at 11:00
    
Hi, we are using PGDB, as the final deliverable to client is a Pgdb. This seems a necessary step as of now. Regarding the Relationship class, yes we use that. Like each electrical service point has a relationship class with customer address. I am able to copy the feature + related table and classes to another new Geodatabase, but to merge 2 or 3 such Pgdb's to a single with the relationship class intact , its difficult I think –  Adarsh Madhavan Mar 13 '13 at 12:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.