Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've calculated the area of polygons with QGIS by using ctr-i - geometry - $area. I've set it on real. The results seem fine, but I've noticed they differ from the area given when I use the i-function.

For example: polygon 4 gives an area of 7,662 km2 when using the i-function but when I Calculate it, it gives an area of 7682816.27364349.

Does anybody know what I'm doing wrong?

Layer CRS is Amersfoort / RD new EPSG:28992

share|improve this question
What software are you using and precisely how are calculating the two areas you are comparing? – whuber Mar 20 '13 at 14:04
It's the same area only the info box gives a different result than the calculating tool. – Tom Mar 20 '13 at 15:27
i'm using Lisboa 1.8.0 – Tom Mar 20 '13 at 15:27

Amersfoort/RD new is based on the Bessel 1841 ellipsoid, which is not quite exact the same as the WGS84 ellipsoid you are measuring with by default.

At least it is a projected CRS, so you don't come up with square degrees.

share|improve this answer

I don't know which tool/language you are using, but I guess parameter -i is giving you integer area while default (without -i flag) is a double precision. So I will go without -i since its more precise.

Nothing is wrong, its just an arithmetic issue.

share|improve this answer
In what sense can 7,662 be construed as an integer equivalent of 7,682.81627364349? They are apart by more than 20 units! – whuber Mar 20 '13 at 15:29
True, so something is wrong. I've noticed that in the option menu the ellipsoid for calculating distances (if translated correctly) is set on WSG84. Only i can't change it into EPSG:28992. I don't know if that's the problem though. – Tom Mar 20 '13 at 15:33
From the internet: [i]To do area calculation correctly always reproject to a projected CRS. (Right click on the layer, "Save As..." and choose a suitable CRS). The area calculations in an unprojected CRS (like WGS84) will be in square degrees, and furthermore will be wrong. QGIS does not calculate area on a sphere, only on a planar CRS, so any length or area calculations done in an unprojected CRS will be misleading. [/i] – Tom Mar 20 '13 at 15:59
What is meant with a projected CRS? – Tom Mar 20 '13 at 16:01
whuber: I saw that they are off by 20m. I focused on int and float, since the area is calculated in small parts and the errors can accumulate to be larger (~20m.) And the guy above says its a wgs84 <-> RD New error which is quite likely. – Naresh Mar 21 '13 at 13:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.