Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a study area in N. Florida loblolly pine plantation with 3 treatments (drought, fertilization, drought+fertilization, control) and 4 replicate plots. All plots will be in the same scene. These treatments are expected to alter the growth and response of pine trees.

The only available existing imagery at the initial time of treatment installation is from quickbird (one in March and one in December) - this will be the baseline image. Ideally, it would be nice to acquire imagery every year and season, it's not feasible due to budget constraints. So, I will probably purchase one, maybe two more images over the next 1-2 years. They should be the same season as the "baseline" scene.

My Question: Which season, if any, is best to discriminate spectral signatures between treatments/plots to really tease out differences in growth due to treatments and estimate NDVI, LAI, and other vegetation indices? I would suspect winter, when everything is not as lush and green and somewhat stressed (relative to summer). What is your expert opinion? Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question
If you are interested in measuring vegetation vigor, consider looking into Worldview-2 imagery from Digital Globe…. With these data you will be able to utilize the red edge and yellow bands for veg analysis. Have you looked into free 4-band 1m NAIP imagery from the NRCS Geospatial Data Gateway? Seeing that you are in Florida, the season is not as important as the spectral bands. – Aaron May 13 '13 at 14:38
I have not looked into WV 2 or NAIP imagery, but will give it a go. I agree, spectral bands will be most important, but season will surely have an effect as H20 content in leaves and plant vigor can have a big effect on reflectance. The reason for going with quickbird is it is the only imagery available at the time of treatment installation. I suppose baseline image is not as important as what the plot will look like in two or three years, but it would be nice to have a baseline image to make comparisons (before and after) - with the same imagery in the same season. Thanks for the suggestions! – SoilSciGuy May 13 '13 at 14:57
Given the budget allows it, I second the advice to look at WorldView-2 imagery. The 8 multi-spectral bands can be a great deal in multi-spectral analysis. – Nikos Alexandris Oct 12 '13 at 19:18
Thanks for the comments, but they don't address the question. I need to establish a baseline - imagery immediately before the the treatments were applied. This limits me to Quickbird because it's the only available imagery in that area for that time. – SoilSciGuy Oct 18 '13 at 17:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.