Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the sources of excellent geo-location data as possessed by Google Maps ?

I am wondering that, even with large amount of volunteer work involved, why is OSM data not comparable to theirs in terms of quality ?

share|improve this question
19  
You mean, "Why is OSM better in many places than Google Maps?" Because asking why Google Maps might be better, given the hundreds of millions of dollars invested by their data partners over the past, oh, say, 25 years (NAVTEQ at least), compared to a 5 year old volunteer project done with practically no funding, seems a bit disingenuous. –  Christopher Schmidt Feb 11 '11 at 9:21
7  
OpenStreetMap does have better data in places where people have taken the time and care to go out in the real-world and map what they see - London, UK has many mapping parties a month and the detail is over 70% more than Google Maps - openstreetmap.org/… - all depends on the area your looking at. –  Mapperz Feb 11 '11 at 15:26
4  
If you want to compare yourself: tools.geofabrik.de/mc (on one side choose Google Maps, on the other side OSM, then zoom). –  markusN Mar 22 '11 at 19:27
1  
With respect to the tile of the question: you can't compare generic "free" and "commercial" data and get a meaningful answer. The field is too wide, and the free/commercial distinction is orthagonal in any case. Some commercial data sets are worse than horrible, others are beyond compare. We could get meaningful answers by asking "how does XXX compare with YYY (for the purpose of ZZZ)?". –  matt wilkie May 9 '11 at 16:38
add comment

5 Answers 5

up vote 16 down vote accepted

See this paper (draft version):

Haklay, M. (2010), How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37(4) 682 – 703.

for more rigorous assessment (in UK context).

This one for assesment (in comparison wth Google Maps & Bing Maps) in Ireland:

Ciepłuch , B., Jacob, R.,Mooney, P., Winstanley, A. (2010) Comparison of the accuracy of OpenStreetMap for Ireland with Google Maps and Bing Maps. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resuorces and Enviromental Sciences 20-23rd July 2010 . p. 337.

And this for assessment in France (paywall):

Girres, J.-F. & Touya, G. (2010) Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset. Transactions in GIS, 14, 435-459.

Germany is covered in this paper:

Zielstra, D., Zipf, A. (2010) Quantitative Studies on the Data Quality of OpenStreetMap in Germany. Paper presented at GIScience 2010.

Very thorough comparison with TomTom data (in Germany as well) is covered here:

Helbich, M., Amelunxen, C., Neis, P. (2012): Comparative Spatial Analysis of Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap and Proprietary Geodata. Int. GI_Forum 2012. Salzburg. Austria.

German street network is also discussed in detail here:

Neis, P.; Zielstra, D.; Zipf, A. (2012) The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet 4, 1-21.

There also two Master's dissertations dealing with this topic: one from UCL:

Kounadi, O. (2009) Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap data.

and one from UNIGIS:

Stark, H-J. (2010) Quality assurance of crowdsourced geocoded address-data within OpenAddresses Concepts and Implementation

Also article from Cartographica (paywall) might be of interest:

Mondzech, J. & Sester, M., (2011) Quality Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Based on Application Needs. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 46, 115-125.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Google do not produce geo-location data: they only publish these data. The data source is displayed at the bottom right corner:

enter image description here

Why these data are better compared to OSM data? Professionals products are usually more expensive but better than the amateur ones.

share|improve this answer
7  
+1 although Wikipedia is often regarded now as comparable or better than the same subjects in published encyclopedias, so maybe in time (and with MS funding - and the MS/Nokia partnershop announced today) the same will happen with OSM. –  geographika Feb 11 '11 at 13:01
2  
Actually, to my knowledge, MapQuest is the company that has actually pledged and paid the most money to support OSM. –  DavidF Feb 11 '11 at 15:52
add comment

It depends how you define quality:

  • Quality as Currency - In many areas OSM is more current than commercial operations. However the level of currency is not necessarily known. Commercial mapping operations will typically publish periodic updates.

  • Quality as precision - The precision of data depends on what the mapping is intended to be used for. Large scale topographic mapping is likely to be of much higher precision than equivalent OSM data. The precision of OSM data is by its very nature more variable.

  • Quality as completeness - In some areas such as developing countries OSM is much more complete. Where commercial data is available it will typically be more complete than the equivalent OSM data, but only within the specification defined by the surveyors.

OSM and commercial mapping data can be compared in terms of objective measures. Quality is too broad a term, and always depends on what you want to do with the data.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you live in the US you will often find that now that Google has switched to using it's own data instead of Navtech's that the quality of Google maps is way behind OSM for the same area. Google's appears to be an import from US Govt sources (TIGER, USGS etc) but with out the volunteer fixes that that OSM has benefited from.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Actually I think in most places in the US Google us using their own data that they collected when making streetview. I've actually found it is the best source in a few places, position and address/routing. It's the only service that gets to my house....

Most street data started from the Census data, ex Navtec. Even OSM imported the census data. Had the census saw (in those days) that their data was to be used as it has been, I wonder if they would have done a better job.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.