Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need help choosing the appropriate Metadata standard for a GDB for a local government. what are your recommendations and why ? what are the main differences between ISO 19139, ISO 19115 and FGDC.

Thanks Geog

share|improve this question
Where is the local government located? Europe vs US vs Australia makes a big difference to the answer(s) you are likely to get? – PolyGeo Jun 18 '13 at 6:39
Medium-sized city in the Middle East – Geog Jun 18 '13 at 6:46
up vote 1 down vote accepted

First to separate ISO 19115 and 19139: Both describe the same. ISO 19115 ist the formal specification of a comprehensive set of metadata properties (some few, I think around 20, of them core metadata which are mandatory, and a huge set, I think some hundreds of optional metadata properties). ISO19139 is just a XML Schema File (XSD) which you can use to validate if a metadata set is valid ISO 19115, its an implementation in fact.

FGDC was specified before in the US, in my personal opinion its simpler.

The problem with ISO is: It was made to merge metadata from different providers, so this comprehensive property set came up, also with many possibilites to store the same in different properties. Nevertheless, every country derives its own profile of ISO 19115, so in most cases just the core metadata really can be merged together. Also attribute field documentation is not very intuitive in most ISO conformal Metadata Editors.

The problem with FGDC is: Probably its lacking properties you need for your documentation.

In fact you should ask yourself the following questions for choosing a standard:

  1. Do you need to exchange metadata with others? what are they using?
  2. Which things do you really want to document? Does the standard provide these?
  3. Tooling: Good, semiautomatic tooling out of the box only exists for the standards out of the box. Do you need special profiles of a standard? Then excpect to customize a Metadata Tool like Geonetwork or ESRI Geoportal Toolkit (this one is BTW NOT integrated with ArcCatalog in any way)

In fact its a good idea to keep it simple. After messing around with Metadata standards for nearly 10 years (and no end in sight) a colleague of mine and I decided that its a good idea to throw all these standards over board and just document the things we need in a database. Open Data let us rethink the whole standardization theme, which really became just to complicated over the couple of years. Just choose the one editor in ArcCatalog that best fits your needs for documentation and information exchange.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.