Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a large raster file with elevation data. From this raster, I would like to infer the average ruggedness for different geographic zones (like countries). I have the "countries shapefile" as a separate polygon shapefile. I was able to get a raster file with a ruggedness measure. However, this raster is still very large. It is therefore not possible to convert it to a shapefile to do a spatial join of the two shapefiles. Since I do not need very precise data, is it possible to either: - convert my raster to a shapefile with an output that has larger cells than the default (I did not find this option) - directly spatially join the raster to the polygon shapefile Do you have any advice? Thank you! I use ArcGis10, Gdal, and Qgis 1.8

share|improve this question
Could this possibly be a RAM limitation? You could try splitting up the image with Split Raster. – Paul Sep 9 '13 at 20:58
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is what zonal raster functions are for. You can obtain zonal variance by using the ArcGIS "Zonal Statistics as Table" tool and then taking the square-root of the standard deviation. Variance is a simple and common measure of roughness.

Your polygon feature-class of countries would be your zone data and your elevation raster would be the value raster. It is quite easy to then join the resulting zonal statistics back to your polygon feature-class based on the FID.

share|improve this answer
+1 for suggesting zonal statistics--but I believe the OP is asking for the zonal mean of a "ruggedness measure" rather than its zonal SD, which would instead be a "ruggedness of the ruggedness." – whuber Sep 10 '13 at 1:21
It would be far more efficient to just take the zonal mean for each country. Even easier than what I originally suggested (did not notice that the OP already has a ruggedness raster). – Jeffrey Evans Sep 10 '13 at 1:36
This works perfectly. Thank you so much – Doon_Bogan Sep 10 '13 at 8:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.