Take the 2-minute tour ×
Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for cartographers, geographers and GIS professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been struggling to find a good software package for drillhole data management, subsurface geology modelling, and visualization (both 2D and 3D): something that can also be used to produce sophisticated vertical and inclined cross sections. I took the Gemcom GEMS course and found the software too complex (database setup, plotting) and rigid. It's also astronomically expensive. I evaluated Target for ArcGIS by Geosoft using their tutorial and data and found it lacking features, buggy and slow. (Dumbed down version that works with ArcGIS.) As I was to evaluate the full standalone version of Target I stumbled over a recommendation for Rockworks by RockWare. The videos on their site look amazing. Too good to be true to be honest. I would like to read some unaffiliated reviews of the software but am having a difficult time finding anything valuable. Can someone please provide a link a share a few thoughts about the software package?

share|improve this question
    
What did you find wrong with Target for ArcGIS? The "dumbed down" concerns me - maybe you need to upgrade versions? The learning curve or risk wouldn't be as great as switching to a new software program entirely. –  user3033 May 19 '11 at 21:02
    
I used the dataset downloaded from Geosoft website. Many outputs are static and no shapefile equivalent is generated. Assay profile has a bug; generated shapefile is very different from the static output, numerous critical error messages troughout the evaluation (followed the provided tutorial), reference grids only avaialbe as "static" output, 3D viewer is external, drill holes "run off" the grid, etc., etc. Just not sufficient for me as I am planning to use 1000's of drillholes, almost all deviated/inclined. Geosoft provided some workarounds but I need something robust and simple. –  Jakub May 20 '11 at 17:56
add comment

4 Answers 4

up vote 8 down vote accepted

I've had a bit of experience with Rockworks (ver. 14.0) and am not incredibly impressed with it. While it's fairly easy to get data into the system, generating any kind of presentation quality (let alone publication quality) diagrams was extremely unintuitive. I gave up and drew the few cross-sections I needed by hand. I also came to realize that the cross-sections that Rockworks did produce were not 3D correct - when I compared locations where two sections intersect, the structural surface elevations did not match.

Recently, a colleague of mine who is re-developing a regional framework for the Floridan aquifer introduced me to Leapfrog Hydro (formerly Aranz Hydro). He is a big proponent of this software, though he hasn't been using it very long himself. According to him, it is more intuitive to use, very robust, and is 3D correct when outputting cross-sections. I believe you can make 3D animations with the software as well.

I haven't had a tremendous amount of experience with either of these pieces of software so please take my words with a grain of salt. However, from what I've seen and experienced I would recommend looking into Leapfrog before Rockworks.

share|improve this answer
    
Excellent. Thanks. I've come across Leapfrog but did not pay much attention to it. I will take a closer look. Thanks for the insight too. I've become wary of packages that sound too good to be true. –  Jakub May 19 '11 at 18:23
    
Also, there looks to be a relatively cheap training course ($200) on using Leapfrog Hydro and applying the results to drive groundwater models. You may not be interested in the latter part of that, but if you can get a plane ticket and paid registration it might be a good way to see if the software is something that you could use. –  Jason May 19 '11 at 18:32
    
I think the Leapfrog Mining package looks more like something we need. Already looked into training for that but can't find anything. –  Jakub May 19 '11 at 18:44
    
Our contact is Thom Krom at Touch Water in Denmark. He's a super nice guy and may be able to point you in the appropriate direction for your needs. If you can't find his contact info on his website let me know and I'll send it to you. –  Jason May 19 '11 at 18:52
    
Thanks a lot! Much appreciated. –  Jakub May 19 '11 at 18:55
add comment

@Jakub We haven't been collecting reviews, but here are some from Google.

http://igwmc.mines.edu/software/igwmcsoft/RockWorks_Review.html

or

http://www.swhydro.arizona.edu/archive/V6_N2/dept-softwarereview.pdf (same review in publication Southwest Hydrology, March/April 2007.

@whuber Thanks for fixing my sig block faux pas.

share|improve this answer
add comment

RockWare has released RockWorks15 with an overhaul of the user interface that makes the program easier to use. You can download a full working model demo from the RockWare web site.

share|improve this answer
1  
Please read our FAQ concerning conventions and policies about posting personal information and references to commercial code. You have done well by clearly identifying yourself as a representative of RockWare and providing a link. –  whuber May 20 '11 at 17:29
    
-1 I don't think this is an answer to the question –  djq May 20 '11 at 17:55
1  
Thanks Tom. Can you provide a link to some user reviews? –  Jakub May 20 '11 at 17:58
    
@Celenius You're right, it's better off as a comment. However, new users can't post comments. A mod can convert responses to comments, but this one has a unique status because it's a response from the vendor of the software in question. I thought the community might consider it to be a kind of indirect reply so I did not change it to a comment. I think we should welcome vendor participation for the unique insight it can offer, but if anyone has feelings to the contrary, I invite you to start a meta thread about this: it's a good way to have your voice heard (and acted on). –  whuber May 20 '11 at 19:52
    
I see. I think that is reasonable - perhaps the answer should mention this? (Though now it is explained here). –  djq May 20 '11 at 21:07
add comment

As a follow-up to Tom Breshahan's comment; (1) I am a RockWare employee (geologist/programmer) so I'm obviously biased. (2) We released RockWorks16 on 7/1/13. (3) We have made over 1,446 changes since the release of RockWorks14 (detailed list: http://www.rockware.com/rockworks/revisions/index.html) (4) You can download the full program and use it for two weeks without paying anything thereby allowing a side-by-side comparison with other products. (5) I apologize for not directly answering the question - our user testimonials are also biased and that's why I recommend a try-with-your-own-data-before-you-buy evaluation.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.