Tag Info

New answers tagged

1

The correct syntax is: cs2cs +proj=lcc +lat_1=41.03333333333333 +lat_2=40.66666666666666 +lat_0=40.16666666666666 +lon_0=-74 +x_0=300000 +y_0=0 +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=us-ft +no_defs +to +init=epsg:4326 -f %%.8f<nad.txt >out.txt with 987043 206407 in the input file nad.txt to get this output: -73.98992216 40.73321572 ...


0

(answering own question, hoisted from comment to question) It seems that I may have reversed lat,lng. Based on transforming (180,0), it seems that this epsg:3857 coordinate system is centered at the equator and scales by meters at the equator, using a circumference of the earth of 40075016.68557849m. So I guess that's how to scale the result.


1

I cannot imagine that UTM is not suitable for your purposes. Are you sure you picked the correct zone for the location of your dataset? Example: http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/32632/ I don't know much about P.T.L. but it seems to work similarly as UTM. It is unlikely that it is included in common GIS coordinate reference system (CRS) definitions, ...



Top 50 recent answers are included