Hot answers tagged


Such a slight systematic shift is usually due to a lack of datum transformation before reprojecting the data. You should test the different transformation and your data will overlap correctly. I can't tell which one is best for you based on the information provided, but you can test it relatively fast. EDIT: if this doesn't work, you have two solutions: ...


To do this I would use the Union tool to calculate the overlap relationships between polygons. I would then use arcpy.da.UpdateCursor to iterate through each polygon and add up the ranks/weights of any polygons that overlap in that area.


If you use a spatial join you can append the attributes of one dataset to the other. If you are trying to fill a particular field you can then just copy it across using the field calulator


Updating R and sp to the released versions will resolve this. It was caused by a change in R's behavior on what nchar(NA) returns: see the help file of ?nchar, argument keepNA.


You may not need KML for the whole world just to get labels turned on. Have you tried selecting a different base imagery layer? It's the second icon from the upper-right on the toolbar. var imagery = Cesium.createDefaultImageryProviderViewModels(); var viewer = new Cesium.Viewer('cesiumContainer', { imageryProviderViewModels: imagery, ...


You could use ifelse as an alternative to if and else blocks in a function. You can nest multiple statements in an ifelse and if you are trying to vectorize a problem, it is much cleaner. Note that an absolute abs statement on a zero value still returns zero so, I just used a very small number as a constant. library(raster) x <- raster(nrows=100, ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible