meta user
network profile
| bio | website | cid-4515677bdf99b35f.spaces.l… |
|---|---|---|
| location | Durham, United Kingdom | |
| age | 40 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | Apr 25 at 9:15 | |
| stats | profile views | 23 |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Apr 22 |
awarded | Constituent |
|
Jan 29 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Dec 14 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Sep 29 |
comment |
Looking for qml specification Yea that was my worry, that said it's really not that complex, a weekends detective work and you should be able to figure the structure out yourself quite easily. |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Looking for qml specification Yes I have. I wrote a small .NET application to extract the style information used in a QGis project and import it into a web based control system used in-house for one of my clients, so their web maps looked the same as the projects their GIS team where using. |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Looking for qml specification As for the DTD on the contrary, it's very useful : xmlfiles.com/dtd a correctly formed DTD will tell you what you can and cannot put in an XML file created using it, in most cases when using a good editor it will also tell you the data type and (In the case of visual studio) will even give intellisense to show the compound types under a tag. All that leaves you to do is a little bit of research as to what the tags and attributes hold, which in most cases is fairly self explanatory. Iv'e done it loads of times with different XML files. |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Looking for qml specification Again, please read the last paragraph in my reply for your answer :-) |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
Looking for qml specification Please read the last paragraph in my reply, starting : 'There's even a DTD.....' the DTD in question is embeded in the first line of the XML file, in XML file terms the DTD IS the specification. |
|
Sep 27 |
revised |
Looking for qml specification added 20 characters in body |
|
Sep 27 |
answered | Looking for qml specification |
|
Sep 27 |
comment |
improve Google map loading time? Same here, I just tried it, and loads ok for me. However far short of using a cache of some sort then any load speed is going to be down to how busy your link to Google is. You might want to consider running on a server with 2 interface cards and 2 interdependent IP's, have your web server bound to one, then route all your other private traffic over the second. |
|
Aug 25 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 25 |
accepted | What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? |
|
Aug 25 |
revised |
What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? added 164 characters in body |
|
Aug 25 |
revised |
What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? added 164 characters in body |
|
Aug 22 |
comment |
What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? I didn't know about 'SnapTo' I'll give that a try :-) Tks. Unfortunately, no, not using PG 2 just yet, upgrade is in the pipeline though. |
|
Aug 22 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 22 |
comment |
What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? Sorry for the confusion: What I meant by my description was one larger polygon created from the smaller ones, I realise that depending on context 'Outer Ring' may mean different things to different folks, my intention was to describe a single polygon created from the boundary present around each polygon group. |
|
Aug 22 |
revised |
What is the best way to join lots of small polygons to form a larger polygon? added 650 characters in body |
