network profile
| bio | website | evaneos.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 10 months |
| seen | May 9 at 13:59 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
Feb 19 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jan 22 |
awarded | Self-Learner |
|
Jan 21 |
answered | How to add topology to PostGIS 2.0? |
|
Jan 21 |
asked | How to add topology to PostGIS 2.0? |
|
Aug 27 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Aug 27 |
answered | small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis |
|
Aug 27 |
comment |
small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis ... I'm really sorry, The background image didn't have the bounds I thought... so the command is working well and the image is perfekt. As often the bug wasn't in complex things :s Thanks for you help. |
|
Aug 27 |
comment |
small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis Thanks for your answer. I'd like to have interaction with the SVG created. I don't think Tilemill manage that. I'm using Raphaeljs to manage the interaction (mouseover, click...). The objective is to have SVG in pixel. So yes, st_scale and st_translate change coordinates but normally, it doesn't change the "projection"... (I removed st_simplify of the request in the question to make it shorter. but yes in the final query, I'll add it.) |
|
Aug 26 |
comment |
small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis Ok I added those information in the question. st_scale doesn't seem to do anything else than multiplying all the data. I don't see an easy solution to show data on a web browser without scaling it before. (scaling a svg with such big numbers doesn't work). I'll try tomorrow with only some points... but I don't have any idea from the source of this problem... |
|
Aug 26 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Aug 26 |
revised |
small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis added 280 characters in body |
|
Aug 26 |
comment |
small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis Thanks for your answer. I'm using the same data for Tilemill and the svg. I added in the tilemill project the example of tilemill there is no problem of projection. In the layer in tilemill I'm using 900913. st_srid give me 3857 in Postgis which seems ok? I'm a beginner in SIG... Is there something else I should check? |
|
Aug 26 |
asked | small difference in projection between tilemill and postgis |
|
Aug 26 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Aug 26 |
accepted | PostGis, export Svg in pixels |
|
Aug 26 |
answered | PostGis, export Svg in pixels |
|
Aug 26 |
comment |
PostGis, export Svg in pixels I finally manage to do that with st_scale and st_translate. Thanks for your help. |
|
Aug 26 |
comment |
PostGis, export Svg in pixels Sorry I was not clear, I needed svg to manage interaction in javascript. |
|
Jul 5 |
awarded | Student |
|
Jul 5 |
asked | PostGis, export Svg in pixels |
