|
May 11 |
answered | Will osm2po or other tools simplify links between nodes? |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to create a suitable filtered .osm for osm2po using OpenStreetMap Overpass API? I'll have to thank you. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to create a suitable filtered .osm for osm2po using OpenStreetMap Overpass API? This is an issue which will be fixed in the next version. |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to create a suitable filtered .osm for osm2po using OpenStreetMap Overpass API? No, this time there's no magic. It's a simple bug I thought I have fixed a long time ago ;-) I've just debugged it and I guess your first region does not contain one restriction, the second one (maybe because it's bigger) does. |
|
Apr 25 |
revised |
How to create a suitable filtered .osm for osm2po using OpenStreetMap Overpass API? added 120 characters in body |
|
Apr 25 |
answered | How to create a suitable filtered .osm for osm2po using OpenStreetMap Overpass API? |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
How to speed up osm2po when using as java lib? The SUPPORT-Parameters enrich a graph object at runtime (via Constructor). A stupid Graph would only know its vertexes and edges which is sufficient if you knew the IDs. e.g. from pgRouting. In order to find closestVertexes you'll need the coordinates. Here it is necessary to load them into memory. This is triggered by the SUPPORT_LATLON const. You'll recognize other SUPPORT-options. Each loads or creates additional data for the Graph at construction time. Another important one is SUPPORT_SEGMENTS which loads all streetnames and geometries into RAM. |
|
Apr 23 |
comment |
what is the main idea of new (since osm2po ver 4.7.7) MultiLevelGridRouter You are right. It doesn't make sense to use such a technique for short distances. Here a normal Dijkstra or AStar should be sufficient. |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
what is the main idea of new (since osm2po ver 4.7.7) MultiLevelGridRouter edited body |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
How to customize logic for defining default speed limits for roads in osm2po added 242 characters in body |
|
Apr 22 |
answered | How to customize logic for defining default speed limits for roads in osm2po |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
How to speed up osm2po when using as java lib? No. If your are programming the API you do not need the Config. graph.support.* parameters can be set via the construcor. new Graph(graphFile, log, Graph.SUPPORT_*) |
|
Apr 22 |
answered | what is the main idea of new (since osm2po ver 4.7.7) MultiLevelGridRouter |
|
Apr 19 |
answered | Some highways segments ignored by osm2po? |
|
Apr 19 |
answered | Load surface to SQL using osm2po |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
How to speed up osm2po when using as java lib? Can you move this question to a new thread? It has nothing to do with creating a matrix. |
|
Apr 18 |
comment |
Load surface to SQL using osm2po Yes, the miracle bag osm2po can even handle this. One question: Are you going to configure it or are there some Java Skills in background? |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
How to speed up osm2po when using as java lib?makePath() returns an array of pointer to the underlying Edge-List (edgeIdx's). If you only need the length, call Graph.calcPathLength(int[] path) after having found your tour. If you need more infos, call lookupSegment(int edgeIdx) for each index in the int[] path-Array. |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
How to speed up osm2po when using as java lib? Indeed, the above example only calculates the matrix. If you need full resulting paths with all information insert int[] path=router.makePath(vertexIds[x]) inside the isVisited()-IF-Block or route over your resulting VertexIds in standard fashion. |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Is it possible to get the points used for the convex hull in osm2po? Since Version 4.7.7 please call GeoUtils.convexHull(...) instead of Utils.convexHull(...) |