Timeline for How "complex" should a JavaScript map become? When does a plugin make more sense?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 | answer | added | Stephen Lead | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 5:17 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatting etc
|
| Nov 28, 2012 at 12:47 | comment | added | jakc | can the client be swayed to move away from the one size app fits all, and start looking at dishing out multiple focussed apps for specific purposes? | |
| Jun 17, 2011 at 2:07 | vote | accept | Stephen Lead | ||
| Jun 10, 2011 at 15:24 | answer | added | MLowry | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 13:29 | answer | added | MathiasWestin | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 6:04 | comment | added | Stephen Lead | @Mapperz if I did that I'd never learn anything new! @Michael thanks for the tips. You can apply a renderer when using a feature layer only (not a dynamic or tiled layer) according to help.arcgis.com/en/webapi/javascript/arcgis/help/… | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 4:11 | comment | added | Michael Todd | A plugin makes more sense when it can do something Javascript cannot. That being said, I'm only familiar with the SL and Flex APIs, so I can't honestly compare them to the JS API. Of the things you listed, changing the symbology is the only thing I'm not sure that the JS API can do (the others should be trivial if you're handy with JS). If you can find out whether that's easy with the JS API, I'd say go for it. | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 3:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGIS/status/79024114383323137 | ||
| Jun 10, 2011 at 2:52 | comment | added | Mapperz♦ | Stick to what you know. | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 0:25 | history | asked | Stephen Lead | CC BY-SA 3.0 |