Timeline for Is there a difference between the Planchon & Darboux and Wang and Liu depression filling algorithms? Other than speed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 at 7:55 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 77 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 19:35 | comment | added | whuber | +1 It is a pleasure to read an informative, thoughtful, knowledgeable answer like this one. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 17:15 | history | edited | WhiteboxDev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 29, 2014 at 6:03 | comment | added | traggatmot | Thanks so much John!!! Informative as always. I now finally understand the important difference between simply filling a depression and enforcing a minimum slope to ensure flow. I was condflating those two ideas before. I want you to know I tried to use Whitebox for this analysis, but I kept running into the error related to the NoData values lining the watershed boundary when running the Planchon and Darboux fill - I know the fix is coming. Did you perform this analysis on a square DEM to avoid that? Thanks again. | |
| Jul 29, 2014 at 5:53 | vote | accept | traggatmot | ||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 4:38 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 5:16 | |||||
| Jul 29, 2014 at 4:34 | history | answered | WhiteboxDev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |