Timeline for Help interpreting Moran's I and Geary's C results
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2014 at 22:10 | comment | added | WhiteboxDev | @whuber, Interesting, I never realized that LISA didn't follow the same [-1,1] range. Do you have a reference? I can't seem to find anything on that. I couldn't find anything in O'Sullivan and Unwin, which is usually my go-to place for this stuff. | |
| Sep 11, 2014 at 20:34 | comment | added | whuber | (1) Wouldn't this plot show local Moran's I? That is not limited to the [-1,1] interval. (2) Variograms are needed for geological applications where the random field is not actually stationary (but is only "intrinsic"): for such data, covariograms (and therefore correlograms) do not exist. Since almost all kriging software originally was written for geology, the variogram became a de facto standard. | |
| Sep 11, 2014 at 19:33 | vote | accept | Luismi | ||
| Sep 11, 2014 at 18:27 | history | edited | WhiteboxDev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2014 at 18:21 | history | answered | WhiteboxDev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |