Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 17, 2015 at 21:45 vote accept Iced_
Nov 6, 2014 at 7:09 answer added AndreJ timeline score: 1
Nov 6, 2014 at 5:48 comment added user30184 Your own thinking was OK. Degree is degree but near the poles the area of an area with a size of degree by degree is smaller than at the equator when measured in square kilometers on the ground. Whichever way you measured the pixel areas you did not made it with a good method.
Nov 6, 2014 at 5:32 history edited PolyGeo
edited tags
Nov 6, 2014 at 4:13 comment added If you do not know- just GIS a degree is a degree is a degree regardless of your location
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:46 comment added Iced_ It's a nice site!
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:25 comment added Michael Stimson This link might help show how areas distort gmaps-samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/poly/puzzledrag.html and it's kind of fun.
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:08 comment added Michael Stimson A degree is a degree at the poles or at the equator, it's 1/360 of the circle, likewise a 1/3 by 1/3 degree cell is the same geographic size but the projected size differs greatly. There are cool interactive sites that show the distortions but I can't find one right now.
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:03 comment added Iced_ Yes, I am using a projected coordinate system. But I still do not understand how the area of a degree longitude has the same area in the north than in the south ... The "longitude lines" are much closer to one another in the north
Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 comment added Michael Stimson You must be looking at the DEM in a projected coordinate system. Rasters contain rectangular pixels - mostly rasters have square pixels. The geographic resolution and area covered is the same but when projected is quite different.
Nov 6, 2014 at 2:57 history asked Iced_ CC BY-SA 3.0