Return to Question

I've been trying the GeoServer Rendering Transformations - Point Stacker. According to this docs there's an optional cellSize parameter for setting the "Size of the cells in which to aggregate points, in pixels, default = 1".

I made the SLD based on the SLD example in the above OpenGeo docs.

I tried 2 cellSize (30 and 150). Here are the results:

Figure 1. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Blue squares are points (exact, not clustered). Orange circles are clusters. Both layers (blue squares & orange circles) are WMS.

There are 41 points in the island.

The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen?

I saw PointStacker - Random locations at different zoom level asking about random position of Point Stacker, but no solid answer so far.

The below picture shows the same points (of another area). Again the blue squares are points (exact, not clustered) & orange circles are clusters.

Figure 2. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Now because the zoom level is very high (more zoom-in than previous picture), the 4 points are not clustered. Ideally the orange points should be rendered in exact position as the blue point layer. But apparently GeoServer renders the orange points with some displacement. This is also asked in this question.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

Now let us see OpenLayers cluster. In contrast with GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (shown in Figure 1 above), OpenLayers cluster doesn't seem to have displacement. Here it is:

Figure 3. OpenLayers Cluster: no displacement

In the above figure, OpenLayer clusters GeoJSON vector points coming from GeoServer WFS. The right-side column is just the same with the left-side, only disabling the blue square for increasing visibility of the number label in OpenLayers clusters.

In the OpenLayers Cluster layer there's a circle with label "1" that is rendered in exact position as the blue square point, which I think is very make sense. To me, OpenLayers cluster is not perfect, but much-much better than GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS).

Did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS)?

• The reason I am pursuing GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored & reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user.

I'm using:

• GeoServer 2.7.0 on Apache Tomcat 7.0.61 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare
• JVM: Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_80 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)
• OpenLayers 2.12
• PostGIS - PostgreSQL 9.4.1 (on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare)

I've been trying the GeoServer Rendering Transformations - Point Stacker. According to this docs there's an optional cellSize parameter for setting the "Size of the cells in which to aggregate points, in pixels, default = 1".

I made the SLD based on the SLD example in the above OpenGeo docs.

I tried 2 cellSize (30 and 150). Here are the results:

Figure 1. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Blue squares are points (exact, not clustered). Orange circles are clusters. Both layers (blue squares & orange circles) are WMS.

There are 41 points in the island.

The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen?

I saw PointStacker - Random locations at different zoom level asking about random position of Point Stacker, but no solid answer so far.

The below picture shows the same points (of another area). Again the blue squares are points (exact, not clustered) & orange circles are clusters.

Figure 2. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Now because the zoom level is very high (more zoom-in than previous picture), the 4 points are not clustered. Ideally the orange points should be rendered in exact position as the blue point layer. But apparently GeoServer renders the orange points with some displacement. This is also asked in this question.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

Now let us see OpenLayers cluster. In contrast with GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (shown in Figure 1 above), OpenLayers cluster doesn't seem to have displacement. Here it is:

Figure 3. OpenLayers Cluster: no displacement

In the above figure, OpenLayers clusters GeoJSON vector points coming from GeoServer WFS. The right-side column is just the same with the left-side, only disabling the blue square for increasing visibility of the number label in OpenLayers clusters.

In the OpenLayers Cluster layer there's a circle with label "1" that is rendered in exact position as the blue square point, which I think is very make sense. To me, OpenLayers cluster is not perfect, but much-much better than GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS).

Did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS)?

• The reason I am pursuing GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored and reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user.

I'm using:

• GeoServer 2.7.0 on Apache Tomcat 7.0.61 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare
• JVM: Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_80 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)
• OpenLayers 2.12
• PostGIS - PostgreSQL 9.4.1 (on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare)

I've been trying the GeoServer Rendering Transformations - Point Stacker. According to this docs there's an optional cellSize parameter for setting the "Size of the cells in which to aggregate points, in pixels, default = 1".

I made the SLD based on the SLD example in the above OpenGeo docs.

I tried 2 cellSize (30 and 150). Here are the results:

Figure 1. GeoServer cluster (using PointStacker) : there's displacement

Blue squares are points (exact, not clustered). Orange circles are clusters. Both layers (blue squares & orange circles) are WMS.

There are 41 points in the island.

The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen?

I saw PointStacker - Random locations at different zoom level asking about random position of PointStacker, but no solid answer so far.

The below picture shows the same points (of another area). Again the blue squares are points (exact, not clustered) & orange circles are clusters.

Figure 2. GeoServer cluster (using PointStacker) : there's displacement

Now because the zoom level is very high (more zoom-in than previous picture), the 4 points are not clustered. Ideally the orange points should be rendered in exact position as the blue point layer. But apparently GeoServer renders the orange points with some displacement. This is also asked in this question.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

Now let us see OpenLayers cluster. In contrast with GeoServer PointStacker cluster (shown in Figure 1 above), OpenLayers cluster doesn't seem to have displacement. Here it is:

Figure 3. OpenLayers Cluster: no displacement

In the above figure, OpenLayer clusters GeoJSON vector points coming from GeoServer WFS. The right-side column is just the same with the left-side, only disabling the blue square for increasing visibility of the number label in OpenLayers clusters.

In the OpenLayer Cluster layer there's a circle with label "1" that is rendered in exact position as the blue square point, which I think is very make sense. To me, OpenLayers cluster is not perfect, but much-much better than GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS).

Did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS)?

• The reason I am pursuing GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored & reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user.

I'm using:

• GeoServer 2.7.0 on Apache Tomcat 7.0.61 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare
• JVM: Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_80 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)
• OpenLayers 2.12
• PostGIS - PostgreSQL 9.4.1 (on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare)

I've been trying the GeoServer Rendering Transformations - Point Stacker. According to this docs there's an optional cellSize parameter for setting the "Size of the cells in which to aggregate points, in pixels, default = 1".

I made the SLD based on the SLD example in the above OpenGeo docs.

I tried 2 cellSize (30 and 150). Here are the results:

Figure 1. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Blue squares are points (exact, not clustered). Orange circles are clusters. Both layers (blue squares & orange circles) are WMS.

There are 41 points in the island.

The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen?

I saw PointStacker - Random locations at different zoom level asking about random position of Point Stacker, but no solid answer so far.

The below picture shows the same points (of another area). Again the blue squares are points (exact, not clustered) & orange circles are clusters.

Figure 2. GeoServer cluster (using Point Stacker) : there's displacement

Now because the zoom level is very high (more zoom-in than previous picture), the 4 points are not clustered. Ideally the orange points should be rendered in exact position as the blue point layer. But apparently GeoServer renders the orange points with some displacement. This is also asked in this question.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

Now let us see OpenLayers cluster. In contrast with GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (shown in Figure 1 above), OpenLayers cluster doesn't seem to have displacement. Here it is:

Figure 3. OpenLayers Cluster: no displacement

In the above figure, OpenLayer clusters GeoJSON vector points coming from GeoServer WFS. The right-side column is just the same with the left-side, only disabling the blue square for increasing visibility of the number label in OpenLayers clusters.

In the OpenLayers Cluster layer there's a circle with label "1" that is rendered in exact position as the blue square point, which I think is very make sense. To me, OpenLayers cluster is not perfect, but much-much better than GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS).

Did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS)?

• The reason I am pursuing GeoServer Point Stacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored & reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user.

I'm using:

• GeoServer 2.7.0 on Apache Tomcat 7.0.61 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare
• JVM: Oracle Corporation: 1.7.0_80 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM)
• OpenLayers 2.12
• PostGIS - PostgreSQL 9.4.1 (on Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter 64-bit on VMWare)

Now the question: The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen? Please advise.

heaps of thanks.

By the way, I reckon other question asking about random position of PointStacker, but no solid answer so far.

===============================

Edited, added more facts.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

===============================

Edited, added more observation.

So did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS)?

-The reason I am pursuing GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored & reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user. I'll be very happy with any suggestion/ideas in this matter-

===============================

The Graphic circles (defined in SLD as <PointSymbolizer>) seems to be positioned incorrectly. The above pictures show that displacement grow with cellSize parameter.

Why does this happen?

I saw PointStacker - Random locations at different zoom level asking about random position of PointStacker, but no solid answer so far.

This picture also shows that displacement grow with cellSize parameter. Interesting enough that the displacements seem to be random.

Did I do anything wrong in my GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS)?

• The reason I am pursuing GeoServer PointStacker cluster (WMS) over OpenLayers Cluster (WFS) is because I feel insecure with WFS. Serving my map as WFS means that I am distributing it in the raw format (text) that can easily be stored & reconstructed into vector map by (smart) user.