Timeline for How can I stop my map algebra being limited to the size of my smallest raster?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 at 8:06 | comment | added | radouxju | You mentioned that the output had the size of the smallest raster, so this at least should solve part of your problem. For the second problem, I usually try to avoid very long "con" string because its difficult to pick up errors. In your case, the workaround could be to reclassify zero/ones rasters using "IsNull()" ," > 75" and " < 25 " , then you sum the three sets of rasters and you can extract your classes in an easier way | |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 7:57 | comment | added | whatahitson | Thanks @radouxju but that doesn't seem to change the result. I don't think its an extent issue because the holes in the small raster also appear in the output. | |
| Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 | history | edited | radouxju | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 140 characters in body
|
| Sep 18, 2015 at 7:46 | history | answered | radouxju | CC BY-SA 3.0 |