Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 24, 2015 at 16:02 answer added AndreJ timeline score: 1
Sep 23, 2015 at 21:46 answer added Mintx timeline score: 0
Sep 23, 2015 at 19:35 comment added ed.hank Well I would have guessed NGVD29 but I saw that another user said that he tried adjusting from NAVD88 to NGVD29 and there were still discrepencies. So just ignore me :)
Sep 23, 2015 at 18:30 comment added nickponline @user3338197 I've added the coordinate description to the original post does this show what the vertical datum is?
Sep 23, 2015 at 18:15 history edited nickponline CC BY-SA 3.0
added 852 characters in body
Sep 23, 2015 at 17:59 history edited nickponline CC BY-SA 3.0
added 384 characters in body
Sep 23, 2015 at 17:29 comment added ed.hank One is height above or below the ellipsoid and the other is not, check your vertical datum
Sep 23, 2015 at 16:53 history edited nickponline CC BY-SA 3.0
added 637 characters in body
Sep 22, 2015 at 21:56 answer added mkennedy timeline score: 5
Sep 22, 2015 at 20:49 comment added nickponline @mkennedy thanks for the response. I'm a bit of a newbie so I'm not sure. I exported the data from a program called Photoscan and it didn't give any options or settings regarding anything except coordinate system.
Sep 22, 2015 at 20:45 comment added mkennedy For external checks, NGS website and look for NADCON (NAD83 to NAD27), GEOID12a (geoid undulation aka ellipsoidal height and NAVD88 difference) and VERTCON (NGVD29 and NAVD88).
Sep 22, 2015 at 20:28 history edited mkennedy CC BY-SA 3.0
added info on CRS
Sep 22, 2015 at 20:28 comment added mkennedy Can you expand on this a bit? Are the input values ellipsoidal heights? The output xy values are in US survey feet. What about the z/height values? What vertical coordinate system are they in? NGVD29, NAVD88, or...? I think I can match the values if I convert the input h to H using geoid12a, thus getting NAVD88, then converting to NGVD29.
Sep 22, 2015 at 20:13 history asked nickponline CC BY-SA 3.0