Skip to main content
Geographic Information Systems

Return to Answer

deleted 11 characters in body
Source Link
PolyGeo ♦
PolyGeo ♦
  • 65.4k
  • 29
  • 114
  • 345

Subtracting the pixel value from the actual or expected value of the dark object is the idea. I will advice that you do that on the natural DN before converting to TOA reflectance. And since you are using QGIS for the analysis, I will suggest that you use the "Semi Auto Classification Plugin" to do the raster processing.

Cheers.

Subtracting the pixel value from the actual or expected value of the dark object is the idea. I will advice that you do that on the natural DN before converting to TOA reflectance. And since you are using QGIS for the analysis, I will suggest that you use the "Semi Auto Classification Plugin" to do the raster processing.

Cheers.

Subtracting the pixel value from the actual or expected value of the dark object is the idea. I will advice that you do that on the natural DN before converting to TOA reflectance. And since you are using QGIS for the analysis, I will suggest that you use the "Semi Auto Classification Plugin" to do the raster processing.

Source Link
Ayodele Adeyemo
Ayodele Adeyemo
  • 104
  • 4

Subtracting the pixel value from the actual or expected value of the dark object is the idea. I will advice that you do that on the natural DN before converting to TOA reflectance. And since you are using QGIS for the analysis, I will suggest that you use the "Semi Auto Classification Plugin" to do the raster processing.

Cheers.