Timeline for Are all remote sensing landcover/use classifications without ground survey scientifically invalid? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gis.stackexchange.com/ with https://gis.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 8:05 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 | history | edited | Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 6:11 | comment | added | Learner |
@PolyGeo removed the academia
|
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 6:10 | history | edited | Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 6:06 | comment | added | PolyGeo♦ | "is it scientifically invalid in academia?" sounds like a question for the Academia Stack Exchange. | |
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:57 | comment | added | Learner | @PolyGeo could you please suggest how to solve the problem- I want to develop a scenerio by mix of hansen data with some other secondary data but this scenerio may not match the proper scientific rigor on the sole ground of no accuracy assessment done for hansen data at subnational level. | |
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:42 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 58 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:40 | comment | added | PolyGeo♦ | Asking for a list of articles leaves this question as too broad. Likewise requesting that someone teaches you how to put together such a list. | |
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:06 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 8, 2016 at 5:38 | |||||
Nov 8, 2016 at 4:52 | comment | added | Learner | OK edited the question and narrowed the asked point. | |
Nov 8, 2016 at 4:50 | history | edited | Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 139 characters in body
|
Nov 7, 2016 at 14:39 | history | closed |
Dan C Mapperz♦ |
Needs more focus | |
Nov 7, 2016 at 14:38 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 7, 2016 at 14:39 | |||||
Nov 7, 2016 at 14:17 | answer | added | TonyC | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 7, 2016 at 12:22 | comment | added | Vince | Generally speaking, it is better to edit the unanswered question than to add another vague question to the pile. | |
Nov 7, 2016 at 12:16 | history | edited | Vince | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed please help; English usage; formatting
|
Nov 7, 2016 at 11:44 | history | edited | Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
Nov 7, 2016 at 11:38 | history | asked | Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |