Timeline for Are all remote sensing landcover/use classifications without ground survey scientifically invalid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 8:04 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 6:09 | comment | added | PolyGeo♦ | The Q&A from Academia sounds like it should be linked to at the beginning of your question here because that triggered it. | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 5:53 | comment | added | Learner | @PolyGeo I am stumbling on this question for many days:( I asked this question in the academia that followed a discussion and concluded into the reason of discarding the research on the ground of not-so-far-done-accuracy and finally they asked to get this answered here. | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 | comment | added | PolyGeo♦ | "will this research be discarded on the ground of not robust" sounds like it may be better researched at the Academia Stack Exchange. | |
| Nov 8, 2016 at 3:59 | comment | added | Learner | Emm,I think I have got 3rd reason most suited here.But could you give light on using hansen data for sub national level and deriving analysis based on it for scientific knowledge.I mean analysis usin hansen with other data to dig into developimg a scenerio..will this research be discarded on the ground of not robust. | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 14:17 | history | answered | TonyC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |