Timeline for "Flooded" islands in converted OSM data
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017 at 21:05 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 66 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2016 at 16:49 | vote | accept | Canuck | ||
| Dec 23, 2016 at 22:21 | answer | added | Canuck | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 22:18 | comment | added | Canuck | No problem, Andre. I was hoping to give you credit, but if that's not a big deal, I'll copy the answer there. | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 19:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackGIS/status/812376930360193028 | ||
| Dec 23, 2016 at 18:10 | comment | added | AndreJ | If you solved it, you can answer your own question with the command line that worked for you. | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 16:01 | comment | added | Canuck | Yes, that solved it—thanks! Still getting my head into the OSM mindset. If you'd like to repost that as an answer, @AndreJ, I'll accept it. | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 15:55 | comment | added | Canuck | Thanks, Andrej. I'll try that and see if it helps. I was thinking in terms of holes in traditional layers. | |
| Dec 23, 2016 at 15:36 | comment | added | AndreJ |
If you only keep ways and relations with natural=water, you might miss islands of different landuse that are inner rings in water multipolygons.
|
|
| Dec 23, 2016 at 15:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 23, 2016 at 15:27 | |||||
| Dec 23, 2016 at 14:55 | history | asked | Canuck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |