Return to Answer

I'd avoid using the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.

I'd avoid using the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.

I'd avoid using the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.

I'd avoid using the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.

I'd avoid to use the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.

I'd avoid using the UTM projection in order to compare areas across six different zones because of the different areal distortions. Instead the Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection (LAEA) is the best option, because it preserves area. For instance, you can use the "US National Atlas Equal Area" (EPSG:2163) or you can define a custom one for Mexico simply changing the coordinates of the natural origin used in the CRS.