Timeline for How to speed up working with QGIS 1.7.4 or is it slow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 20 at 9:51 | review | Close votes | |||
May 26 at 3:04 | |||||
S May 20 at 8:30 | history | suggested | reducing activity | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
make clear it is about an ancient QGIS version
|
May 18 at 23:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 20 at 8:30 | |||||
May 17, 2019 at 22:02 | answer | added | huha | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 3, 2017 at 15:56 | answer | added | Pablo | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 19, 2014 at 16:09 | comment | added | dowi | turning off the render button like you said made the difference for me!!! thanks! | |
Sep 1, 2012 at 11:46 | comment | added | underdark | @pyrogerg You can post your last update as an answer. Please also consider accepting an answer, even if it's your own. | |
Sep 1, 2012 at 11:45 | history | edited | underdark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Sep 1, 2012 at 7:49 | comment | added | vinayan | the title is a bit misleading...could be rephrased to address the current situation...qgis is generally fast | |
Sep 1, 2012 at 3:41 | comment | added | user9907 | Assuming there are always going to be factors that make the rendering slower or faster, I think the best scenario is to move to a background rendering thread that doesn't lock up the whole application while it's working. I love QGIS. It is very stable, but it can take several minutes to re-render the view and it just blanks out the whole lot and redraws it completely. All my layers are file-based and can be up to 1 GB per map (the majority of this is large GeoTiff relief backgrounds). This is probably always going to be slow, but QGIS could put the rendering into a separate thread, and make it | |
May 8, 2012 at 2:29 | history | edited | Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 361 characters in body
|
May 2, 2012 at 3:44 | answer | added | Banger | timeline score: 1 | |
May 2, 2012 at 0:00 | comment | added | djq | I noticed that QGIS 1.7.4 connecting locally to my PostGIS 2.0 database is extremely slow on my powerful windows computer, but it works speedily on my much slower Mac(OSX). I haven't figure out what the problem is either..... | |
May 1, 2012 at 23:08 | history | edited | underdark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 242 characters in body
|
May 1, 2012 at 14:38 | comment | added | nhopton | Could this be the labelling issue? It might be worth rendering the layer without labels to see if this makes a difference. | |
May 1, 2012 at 14:30 | comment | added | MappaGnosis | Do you get the same problem with other data layers or is it just this one in particular? If so, I wonder if there is some invalid geometry in your data, or even a large amount of null geometry. | |
May 1, 2012 at 14:00 | answer | added | Nicklas Avén | timeline score: 2 | |
May 1, 2012 at 13:56 | comment | added | Simbamangu | This does sound unusual - QGIS usually performs very well compared to other GIS systems. I'd suspect some sort of delay with the remote database, though it sounds like a small set of data. What other data do you have loaded? | |
May 1, 2012 at 13:42 | answer | added | GIS-Jonathan | timeline score: 2 | |
May 1, 2012 at 13:06 | history | asked | Gregory | CC BY-SA 3.0 |