Timeline for Route Events Won't Interpolate Z Values On 3D Route?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2017 at 22:32 | comment | added | FelixIP | If you have polylineZ ready, convert vertices to points, add geometry attributes (z) and use these points to calibrate routes with measure being Z. I applied this technique for 100 kms of pipes, to find their depth at crossings with roads. | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 17:37 | comment | added | FelixIP | Values 2, 3 ,1 in my example ARE z values or could be anything else. Frankly it takes less time to solve your task using 3 lines above, rhan theoretise about it. | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 13:44 | comment | added | Erin Godwin | That makes sense FelixIP, but I agree with jbalk that I do have a 3D route. If the z values aren't used in linear referencing, that makes sense, but the geonet example indicated that you could use this method to get z values for points of interest/route events from the route. As jbalk indicated, my question really is: if the Z values play no role/ aren't conferred to route events that are located on a 3D route (a Polyline ZM with valid z values), how does one use the method described in the geonet post to interpolate z values of points of interest? | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 6:15 | comment | added | jbalk | This doesn't answer the question. There is a link to the post on how to capture the z info once you've created the event layer. | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 5:38 | comment | added | FelixIP | Because z plays no role in locating events along the road. Even if I've managed to create 3d route, the results above will stay the same | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 5:32 | comment | added | Fezter | Why wouldn't you consider 3D routes to exist in terms of linear referencing? 3D routes are perfectly valid. Consider a road that goes down a mountain. In plan view, it is much shorter than it actually is. | |
| Sep 15, 2017 at 5:23 | history | answered | FelixIP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |