Timeline for Displaying generated lines out of map extent using QGIS?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2019 at 7:43 | answer | added | Mesa | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 1, 2018 at 13:30 | comment | added | mamouthautapis | Thanks for your answer, which is clear about the difference of rendering geometries and an expression within the layer styling. Attributes used are 'INSEE_COM', 'CODGEO', 'DCLT' (and 'NBFLUX' for line's width) | |
| Feb 1, 2018 at 13:28 | vote | accept | mamouthautapis | ||
| Jan 31, 2018 at 16:55 | answer | added | jcarlson | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 31, 2018 at 16:24 | comment | added | jcarlson | Could you share which attributes you're using in your expression? I'm trying to replicate this with the same data, and want it to be as applicable as possible. | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 9:38 | comment | added | mamouthautapis | Yes, I guess that's the exact same issue. | |
| Jan 12, 2018 at 14:14 | comment | added | Rostranimin | Is this the same problem as I've had (if it is it gives a simple way to understand this issue - if not, ignore me): I wanted to show a point dataset with the whole set of generated points shifted 300km east and 600km north in comparison to the actual points. It works - but only when zoomed out so that the original points are within the map canvas. As soon as you zoom to the set of generated points (moving the actual point locations outside the canvas) the generated points vanish. (QGIS 2.14) | |
| Dec 14, 2017 at 12:48 | comment | added | Julian | Maybe segmenting the line could be a hack to make it appear on the map, if lines are only showed ib both of the ends are close to the map extent. Grass-tool 'v.split.length' maybe does the job. | |
| Nov 22, 2017 at 17:44 | comment | added | mamouthautapis | Shapefile comes from here : IGN and the joined table from INSEE | |
| Nov 21, 2017 at 16:22 | comment | added | César Arquero Cabral | May be you can upload your data (shp...) in order to be able to replicate your steps and try to get an answer. | |
| Nov 14, 2017 at 19:44 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 14, 2017 at 19:24 | comment | added | Andrew Tice | This won't be helpful...but I get the same issue with Underdark's flow mapping approach. It must be something about the way dense geometry is rendered ... only suggestion is to play with the attribute width for the local level map... make the widths smaller? | |
| Nov 7, 2017 at 20:08 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 18:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackGIS/status/927972215894790144 | ||
| Nov 7, 2017 at 16:25 | history | edited | mamouthautapis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2017 at 15:05 | history | asked | mamouthautapis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |