Timeline for Source for GeoJSON data for the US
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 29, 2022 at 8:36 | history | suggested | patridge | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update 404 census URL and avoid some redirects on other URLs.
|
| May 29, 2022 at 2:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 29, 2022 at 8:36 | |||||
| Jul 15, 2014 at 14:16 | comment | added | Joe Germuska | Use TIGER2013 to get the congressional districts (and state legislative districts) as they were redrawn after the 2010 census. www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2013 | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 18:31 | comment | added | EFC | Thanks for pointing this out, Marjorie. I'm not surprised that redistricting is not fully reflected in these 2010 files. But it is good to be alert about this lag. | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 17:29 | comment | added | Marjorie Roswell | I just downloaded, unzipped, and checked gz_2010_us_050_00_20m.zip: It's using the older districts, too. Here's what CA should look like for the current congress: nationalatlas.gov/printable/printableViewer.htm?imgF=images/… | |
| Nov 19, 2013 at 15:10 | comment | added | EFC | @MarjorieRoswell, can you tell whether the source data was the issue, or is there a problem with only the JSON? | |
| Nov 18, 2013 at 18:07 | comment | added | Marjorie Roswell | Was using these, gratefully, but just noticed that California districts are not accurate for 113th Congress. For instance, in eric.clst.org/wupl/Stuff/gz_2010_us_500_11_20m.json look in the northern part of the state. Not sure of accuracy other states. | |
| May 29, 2012 at 5:06 | history | edited | EFC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
slight editorial correction
|
| May 29, 2012 at 5:01 | history | answered | EFC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
