Skip to main content
replaced https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc with https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc
Source Link

According to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

According to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

According to the GeoJSON specification https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

corrected typo
Source Link
nmtoken
  • 13.6k
  • 5
  • 38
  • 89

AccordningAccording to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

Accordning to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

According to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.

Source Link
Stefan
  • 1.8k
  • 9
  • 12

Accordning to the GeoJSON specification https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7946#page-7 the coordinates should be in order lon lat. Your data seems to have order lat lon.