Timeline for Landsat level-2 data comparison
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2020 at 7:55 | vote | accept | user5858 | ||
| Jul 27, 2020 at 22:06 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 47 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2020 at 21:28 | comment | added | Jeffrey Evans | Careful, this may not be the case for the "analysis ready" products. The USGS applies a dynamic range correction to the imagery to correct for wavelength variation. This has been a common correction since the deployment of ETM+7. I had not seen any published correction for cross calibration of dynamic ranges for OLI. You can use Roy et al (2016) band corrections for ETM but not TM5. I guess you could correct TM5 to ETM then to OLI using these coefficients. I just wish they would have developed their coefficient globally. | |
| Jul 27, 2020 at 20:53 | vote | accept | user5858 | ||
| Jul 29, 2020 at 7:54 | |||||
| Jul 27, 2020 at 20:52 | history | answered | user5858 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |