Skip to main content

Timeline for Verification of map scale

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 19, 2021 at 14:15 comment added Vince "Far away from the equator" is the issue. Every row in Web Mercator has a different pixel size, each one getting larger away from the Equator (when the globe actually gets smaller).
Aug 19, 2021 at 14:14 comment added Ian Turton Another thing to check is if your screen pixels are really .28x10-3 metres across
Aug 19, 2021 at 14:08 history edited Vince CC BY-SA 4.0
tyop; nsminh
Aug 19, 2021 at 14:05 comment added theDrifter @Vince this map convers a world region far away from the poles or the equator. In this case quite usefull
Aug 19, 2021 at 13:58 comment added theDrifter @IanTurton the pixel size matches now the calculated size of 0.07m. This does relate to the image pixels and therefore the data - and should be independent from the device used for displaying the data. So i do not understand where this difference comes from
Aug 19, 2021 at 13:55 comment added theDrifter @Erik yes i tried and the result match the calculated value
Aug 19, 2021 at 13:52 history edited theDrifter CC BY-SA 4.0
further tests
Aug 19, 2021 at 12:43 comment added Vince Calculating scale based on Web Mercator is an exercise in futility, since distances off the Equator can't be accurate (and approach infinitely inaccurate at the poles).
Aug 19, 2021 at 10:03 comment added Ian Turton Just because the server will serve data with that resolution it doesn't mean that the data itself is that resolution, i.e. there can be many screen pixels to the image pixel.
Aug 19, 2021 at 8:40 comment added theDrifter Ah no, good point. I ll try that with QGis
Aug 19, 2021 at 8:38 comment added Erik Have you tried loading the WMTS into a GIS, zoomed completely in and then measured the resolution/pixelsize?
Aug 19, 2021 at 8:20 history asked theDrifter CC BY-SA 4.0