Timeline for Is OSM2PO ignoring some ways?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 at 1:53 | history | edited | Fezter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 20 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gis.stackexchange.com/ with https://gis.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 8, 2013 at 11:26 | comment | added | Carsten | tertiary_link simply does not exist. It's a self invented tag. If some fool has tagged a street that way, just tell osm2po to include even this in your osm2po.config file. | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 18:23 | comment | added | Fabrice Marchal | I've got a very similar problem in china-OSM data. Is there a difference between highway=tertiary and higway=tertiary_link ? seems the later is not imported by osm2po | |
| Nov 21, 2012 at 14:02 | history | edited | underdark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 917 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2012 at 22:28 | vote | accept | Zupo Llask | ||
| Nov 20, 2012 at 22:24 | comment | added | Zupo Llask | OK... Thank you very much for your help! :-) What I'm not getting (and this is the reason I was thinking this could be some OSM2PO problem) is why OSRM was routing this "properly" and OSM2PO not, with the same data source. Is it really the same data source? Do you have any suggestion to avoid problems like this? Thanks for your help and you work @ OSM2PO! :-) | |
| Nov 20, 2012 at 19:06 | history | edited | Carsten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 39 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2012 at 18:55 | history | answered | Carsten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |