Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
PolyGeo
  • 65.4k
  • 29
  • 114
  • 345
Post Locked by PolyGeo
Notice added Wiki Answer by PolyGeo
Post Made Community Wiki by PolyGeo
edited tags
Source Link
PolyGeo
  • 65.4k
  • 29
  • 114
  • 345

What are the existing Existing solutions to automate generalisation/simplification of geographical data?

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

How do you proceed when you need to simplify your geographical data? DoDo you know and use some tools related to this topic? What issimplify your opinion on these toolsgeographical data?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

EDIT: theThe very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

What are the existing solutions to automate generalisation/simplification of geographical data?

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

How do you proceed when you need to simplify your geographical data? Do you know and use some tools related to this topic? What is your opinion on these tools?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

EDIT: the very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

Existing solutions to automate generalisation/simplification of geographical data?

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

Do you know and use some tools to simplify your geographical data?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

The very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

link update; deleted 22 characters in body
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

How do you proceed when you need to simplify your geographical data? Do you know and use some tools related to this topic? What is your opinion on these tools?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation websiteICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

EDIT: the very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm (see also here) is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

How do you proceed when you need to simplify your geographical data? Do you know and use some tools related to this topic? What is your opinion on these tools?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

EDIT: the very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm (see also here) is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

I am looking for existing solutions (softwares, libraries, methods, etc.) to automate the generalisation/simplification of geographical data as presented there, and also there.

How do you proceed when you need to simplify your geographical data? Do you know and use some tools related to this topic? What is your opinion on these tools?

I already had a look at these ones:

The ICA commission on generalisation and multiple representation website is a huge information source on this topic. Many papers presents advanced methods and use cases related to this topic.

EDIT: the very famous douglass & peucker filtering algorithm is often used for geometrical simplification and is present in almost all GIS softwares. However, its effect is to make geometries very bony/angular without really simplifying the geometry shape. For example, it is not very adapted for lines representing roads or rivers, that have to be smooth and not angular.

new link
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94
Loading
added 447 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94
Loading
deleted 18 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94
Loading
added 377 characters in body
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94
Loading
Source Link
julien
  • 10.3k
  • 6
  • 56
  • 94
Loading