Timeline for Any rules of thumb for neighborhood settings in Focal Statistics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jun 18, 2015 at 7:49 | history | suggested | TsvGis |
added tag focal-statistics
|
|
Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 18, 2015 at 7:49 | |||||
Jun 18, 2015 at 6:33 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made title more concise
|
May 7, 2013 at 9:52 | answer | added | AnserGIS | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2012 at 19:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackGIS/status/285823325215813632 | ||
Dec 18, 2012 at 8:08 | comment | added | whuber | The neighborhood shape is not typically chosen based on a feature's shape, @Fezter, but based on what kind of analysis is intended and how it will be interpreted. For instance, to create a summary of all landcover to the northeast of each point, you would need to use a southwest-pointing wedge terminating at the center of the neighborhood. Annuli are used to summarize conditions at various buffer distances from each point. A square differs from a circle by being closely tied to the coordinate system (making it a somewhat artificial (but handy) shape), whereas the circle is not so tied. | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 23:41 | comment | added | Fezter | I'm not really sure of the correct answer, and I'm curious to see what answers people will post. But, since tree canopies are, in general, roughly circular, then it seems reasonable that a circle would be appropriate. Maybe even a square, but probably not a wedge or an annulus. | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 18:09 | history | asked | Aaron♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |