Timeline for Trim/ Extend tool -- doesn't snap to intended feature
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10 at 17:03 | comment | added | CatchE | That's what I was thinking, but when I mentioned that maybe "close was close enough to count," I was immediately shut-down like it was dumb of me to think that. We were zoomed in to the 1:0 scale and it was a very tiny gap (like, .00004 ft). I also thought a vertex insertion might help, so thanks for boosting my confidence that maybe I do sometimes know what I am talking about, lol. | |
| Jul 10 at 3:37 | comment | added | Michael Stimson | How small is small? Coordinates are finite and have a minimum division, the only way to ensure an actual connection is to insert a vertex on the water main at the coordinate of the service lateral line end. Is this actually causing a problem? Network and geoprocessing tools are aware of this limitation and will take it into account in their operation. | |
| Jul 9 at 21:31 | history | asked | CatchE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |