Timeline for Clipped raster is 5 times bigger than source [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24 at 14:05 | history | edited | Nikolay Yasinskiy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 104 characters in body
|
| Nov 21 at 8:02 | vote | accept | Nikolay Yasinskiy | ||
| Nov 21 at 0:39 | comment | added | user2856 |
Please edit your question to include the output of gdalinfo clipped_raster and also specify exactly how you clipped it.
|
|
| Nov 20 at 22:39 | history | closed | PolyGeo♦ | Needs details or clarity | |
| Nov 20 at 22:39 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Nov 20 at 22:02 | answer | added | user30184 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 20 at 21:52 | comment | added | Andre Geo | Check the data type of the clipped raster, in layer properties. The PROBAV uses 8-bit unsigned integer values. Probably the clipped layer uses 32-bit integers or floats, which will balloon the file size | |
| Nov 20 at 20:18 | comment | added | Nikolay Yasinskiy | I used Deflate compression (Predictor 2, ZLevel 9) | |
| Nov 20 at 19:40 | comment | added | Ian Turton | Compression would do that | |
| Nov 20 at 17:11 | history | asked | Nikolay Yasinskiy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |