Timeline for Choosing projection for rasterization of random latitude and longitude data in northern Atlantic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2018 at 2:01 | history | edited | PolyGeo♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body; edited title; edited tags
|
| Feb 28, 2013 at 11:06 | vote | accept | ryanjdillon | ||
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:20 | answer | added | whuber | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 13, 2013 at 15:07 | history | edited | ryanjdillon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 19 characters in body
|
| Feb 13, 2013 at 9:27 | history | edited | ryanjdillon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added information requested from comments
|
| Feb 12, 2013 at 22:57 | history | edited | Fezter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2013 at 17:55 | comment | added | whuber | The answer might depend on the nature of the data and the interpolation method you choose. For instance, if your data follow correlation patterns that track along lines of latitude and you want to krige the data, you would likely favor a projection in which those lines of latitude are roughly straight and parallel, even though there might be a lot of distortion. Could you share some relevant information about the data and how you plan to interpolate them? | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 17:33 | history | edited | AndreJ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Feb 12, 2013 at 17:32 | answer | added | AndreJ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 12, 2013 at 17:07 | history | edited | underdark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 12, 2013 at 16:57 | history | asked | ryanjdillon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |