Skip to main content
added 348 characters in body
Source Link
AndreJ
  • 77.1k
  • 5
  • 88
  • 163

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

 

EDIT

Can you share "right" and "wrong coordinates of a sample point, eIf the background data is from istat.git, it will most probably be in ED50-UTM32N, according to this document. Here is a street crossing that can be easily foundsmall example of the border data in satellite imagery?right (green) and wrong (red) CRS: Borders in WGS84+ED50 UTM32

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

EDIT

Can you share "right" and "wrong coordinates of a sample point, e.g. a street crossing that can be easily found in satellite imagery?

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

 

EDIT

If the background data is from istat.it, it will most probably be in ED50-UTM32N, according to this document. Here is a small example of the border data in right (green) and wrong (red) CRS: Borders in WGS84+ED50 UTM32

added 149 characters in body
Source Link
AndreJ
  • 77.1k
  • 5
  • 88
  • 163

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

EDIT

Can you share "right" and "wrong coordinates of a sample point, e.g. a street crossing that can be easily found in satellite imagery?

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

EDIT

Can you share "right" and "wrong coordinates of a sample point, e.g. a street crossing that can be easily found in satellite imagery?

typo
Source Link
AndreJ
  • 77.1k
  • 5
  • 88
  • 163

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-tramsformationtransformation should be switched on.

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-tramsformation should be switched on.

With an offset of around 200 metres, it looks like a missing data shift.

Your target SRS is exactly WGS84, that is +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0

If I create a raster grid with ED50 UTM 32 EPSG:23032, it is shifted 200m to the south and 80m to the west to the WGS84 UTM 32 grid. The shift parameter of ED50 is +towgs84=-87,-98,-121,0,0,0,0

To see which of your layers is right, you can change the project SRS to EPSG:3857, install open layers plugin, load Google or Openstreetmap background and see which layers are well aligned to that.

Most probably the false layers must be assigned to EPSG:23032. Please do not reproject the data to EPSG:23032, because this will change the coordinates, but will not shift the data. Instead you have to assign that CRS.

On-the-fly-transformation should be switched on.

Source Link
AndreJ
  • 77.1k
  • 5
  • 88
  • 163
Loading