Timeline for "Extract by Mask" changing raster pixel values...or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2013 at 8:52 | comment | added | Naresh | Did you fix it? What you say is weird. To sum up, your pixels values got changed when you extracted by mask? Is there any data conversion being done too? | |
| Apr 16, 2013 at 17:28 | comment | added | GotsMahBox | I was sort of figuring that "all's well that ends well". What has given me pause however is the fact that the attribute table is altered. As you can see in the picture I included above, the selected (highlighted) cells for both the original and extracted raster have values equal to or less than the original minimum. As this is just the symbology this wouldn't bother me normally, but in the attribute table for the original raster there are no values (i.e. the count is zero) for values 0-23. In the extracted raster this is not the case. Thoughts? | |
| Apr 15, 2013 at 14:27 | history | answered | Naresh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |